Low confidence because this is only part of a phrase, and whether or not it will work in your context depends on a lot of uinknown factors, particularly whether you want to retain the indefinite article or not.

But all I can offer, without more background information

suggestion

A bit off the original but this is what it means for me and it's "snappy"

Hello,

I think "endorse" may work here in a distribution agreement for "dfense".

Also:

prix = pricing

technique (feminine word here) = production methods

qualité = quality


All said in my very humble opinion.


I hope this helps.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 8 hrs (2012-04-13 01:03:09 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

https://www.melancor.com/html/Melancor Distributor Agreement...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs (2012-04-13 01:16:39 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

My understanding is that the distributor will:

1)sell it as a price that the manufacturer would find reasonable (considering what it was bought for)

2) treat it and sell it with the quality that the manufacturer has set for it


3) respects how the product was produced as told by the manufacturer (discloses it, promotes it, etc)

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 days5 hrs (2012-04-15 22:08:00 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I don't think you'd want something "snappy" in a distribution agreement, no? This is a formal document, and thus requires more "formal" language.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 days6 hrs (2012-04-15 22:27:38 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

See this link below. I think we're dealing with proprietary product lines

w.manufacturing.net/articles/2009/09/proprietary-product-lines-and-their-benefits-to-distributors

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 days6 hrs (2012-04-15 22:28:10 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

http://www.manufacturing.net/articles/2009/09/proprietary-pr...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 days6 hrs (2012-04-15 22:35:37 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Perhaps we're not dealing with proprietary product lines....was just over-reflecting!

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 days6 hrs (2012-04-15 22:42:38 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I'm not sure about the best way to translate "technique". Perhaps "production methods" is too broad. Perhaps just "methods", and skip "production".